Download article

Authors: Afri, Obbie

Title: Green, Safe, and Misleading? ESG Investment Products, Greenwashing, and the Protection of Vulnerable Retail Investors in the European Union

Abstract: The rapid expansion of ESG-labelled investment products in the European Union has transformed sustainable finance into a mainstream retail market offering. Through digital platforms such as banking applications and robo-advisors, “green” investments are increasingly presented as both ethically desirable and financially responsible. While EU regulation has significantly strengthened sustainability-related disclosure through instruments such as MiFID II, the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), the EU Taxonomy Regulation, and the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD), sustainability classification does not imply reduced financial risk. Nevertheless, simplified ESG labels, fund names, and digital interface design may influence investor perception, particularly among vulnerable retail investors with limited financial literacy. This paper examines whether the current EU legal framework adequately protects retail investors from misleading sustainability framing in digital environments. It argues that EU sustainable finance law remains predominantly disclosure-based and insufficiently attentive to behavioural and perceptual effects. The paper proposes a more integrated interpretation of financial and consumer protection rules, emphasising vulnerability and the need to distinguish clearly between environmental alignment and financial safety.

Keywords: Consumer protection; ESG labelling; greenwashing; retail investor vulnerability; sustainable finance regulation

Cite as: Afri, O. (2026). Green, Safe, and Misleading? ESG Investment Products, Greenwashing, and the Protection of Vulnerable Retail Investors in the European Union. Studia Juridica et Politica Jaurinensia, 13(1), 13–37. https://doi.org/10.71100/STUDIA.2026.1.2

Doi: 10.71100/STUDIA.2026.1.2

References:

1. BEUC. (2025, October 30). Greenwashing of sustainable finance products discouraging consumers from investing (BEUC-PR-2025-033). https://www.beuc.eu/press-release/green washing-sustainable-finance-products-discouraging-consumers-investing
2. Comfort, N., & Jennen, B. (2020, June 29). Wirecard collapse reveals Germany's financial oversight problems. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2020/6/29/wirecard-collapse-reveals-germanys-financial-oversight-problems
3. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1253 of 21 April 2021 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/565 as regards the integration of sustainability factors, risks and preferences into certain organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms (MiFID II Delegated Regulation).
4. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D. & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0149206310388419
5. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A. & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
6. Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, UCPD).
7. Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (recast) (MiFID II). Official Journal of the European Union, L 173, 349–496.
8. Economic Governance Support Unit. (2020). Thematic digest on the Wirecard case (PE 651.345). European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies. https://www.europarl.europa. eu/thinktank/mt/document/IPOL_BRI(2020)651345
9. European Banking Authority. (2020, May 12). EBA publishes its inquiry into dividend arbitrage trading schemes (“Cum-Ex/Cum-Cum”), and announces a 10-point action plan to enhance the future regulatory framework. https://www.eba.europa.eu/publications-and-media/press-releases/eba-publishes-its-inquiry-dividend-arbitrage-trading-schemes
10. European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). (2022a). Final report on the European Commission mandate on certain aspects relating to retail investor protection (ESMA35-42-1227). https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma35-42-1227_final_report_on_ technical_advice_on_ec_retail_investments_strategy.pdf
11. European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). (2022b). Guidelines on certain aspects of the MiFID II suitability requirements (ESMA35-43-3172). https://www.esma.europa.eu/ sites/default/files/library/esma35-43-1163_guidelines_on_certain_aspects_of_mifid_ii_ suitability_requirements_0.pdf
12. European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). (2022c). 2021 annual report. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma22-439-962_2021_annual_ report.pdf
13. European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). (2024). Final report: Guidelines on funds’ names using ESG or sustainability-related terms (ESMA34-472-440). https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-05/ESMA34-472-440_Final_Report_ Guidelines_on_funds_names.pdf
14. European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). (2025). Thematic notes on clear, fair & not misleading sustainability-related claims: Addressing greenwashing risks in support of sustainable investments (ESMA36-429234738-154). https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ 2025-07/ESMA36-429234738_-154_Thematic_notes_on_clear__fair___not_misleading_ sustainability-related_claims.pdf
15. Ewing, J. (2015, September 22). Volkswagen says 11 million cars worldwide are affected in diesel deception. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/23/business/international/ volkswagen-diesel-car-scandal.html
16. Forliano, C., Battisti, E., De Bernardi, P. & Kliestik, T. (2025). Mapping the greenwashing research landscape: A theoretical and field analysis. Review of Managerial Science, 19, 3407–3456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00856-3
17. HSF Kramer. (2024, January 30). ESG – Disclosure, reporting, labelling, anti-greenwashing requirements and beyond. Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP. https://www.hsfkramer.com/ insights/reports/fsr-outlook-2024/esg-disclosure-reporting-labelling-anti-greenwashing-requirements-and-beyond
18. Huang, S. & Xu, X. (2025). A fall into a pit, a gain in your wit: The Greensill’s collapse. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 28(3), 382–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/rmir.70017
19. Hutchinson, T. & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83–119. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70
20. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
21. Liu, L., Ma, Z., Zhou, Y., Fan, M. & Han, M. (2024). Trust in ESG reporting: The intelligent Veri-Green solution for incentivized verification. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 5, 100189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2024.100189
22. London Reporting Academy. (2025, February 6). IAASB and IESBA introduce new standards to enhance transparency in sustainability reporting. https://reporting.academy/en/pages/iaasb-and-iesba-introduce-new-standards-to-enhance-transparency-in-sustainability-reporting/
23. Naseer, M. M., Guo, Y. & Zhu, X. (2025). Short-term costs and long-term gains of ESG initiatives in high-risk environments: Evidence from UK firms. Development and Sustainability in Economics and Finance, 7, 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsef.2025.100075
24. Oliveira, J. A. P. de, Wanke, P., Antunes, J. & Tan, Y. (2025). Unveiling the impact of information vagueness on carbon emission disclosure. Energy Economics, 146, 108672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108672
25. Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
26. Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (Taxonomy Regulation).
27. Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A. & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937–967. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.937
28. S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York. (2023, September 12). Co-founder of multibillion-dollar cryptocurrency scheme “OneCoin” sentenced to 20 years in prison. U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/co-founder-multibillion-dollar-cryptocurrency-scheme-onecoin-sentenced-20-years-prison
29. Wang, Z. & Sarkis, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1607–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.142
30. Wong, J. B. & Zhang, Q. (2022). Stock market reactions to adverse ESG disclosure via media channels. The British Accounting Review, 54(6), 101045. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.bar.2022.101045
31. Xu, M., Tse, Y. K., Geng, R., Liu, Z. & Potter, A. (2025). Greenwashing and market value of firms: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 284, 109606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109606
32. Zhou, G., Liu, L. & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(8), 3371–3385. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3089