Emerging Trends in International Consumer Protection...

Category: Wanjiru, Ann Wanja, Consumer Protection & Dispute Resolution, EU Law & Regulatory Governance, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2026, Sustainability, ESG & Environmental Law, Current Issue, Articles, Alternative Dispute Resolution & Mediation

Download article

Open-Access-logo.png CC-BY-NC-ND-logo.png

Authors: Wanjiru, Ann Wanja ORCID_iD.svg.png

Title: Emerging Trends in International Consumer Protection: Sustainable Consumption Laws and ADR Mechanisms in the European Union

Abstract: The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) call for environmentally sustainable production and consumption in line with the green transition within the European Union (EU); however, the EU is yet to fully incorporate Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms (ADR) in the resolution of environmental matters, let alone in providing redress for disgruntled consumers and traders. This paper attempts to analyse the effectiveness of the incorporation of ADR mechanisms in consumer protection disputes within the EU as an alternative to litigation, with a keen look at international emerging trends and international best practices.

Keywords: Alternative dispute resolution, sustainable development goals, sustainable consumption and production, European Union, environmental sustainability

Cite as: Wanjiru, A. W. (2026). Emerging Trends in International Consumer Protection: Sustainable Consumption Laws and ADR Mechanisms in the European Union. Studia Juridica et Politica Jaurinensia, 13(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.71100/STUDIA.2026.1.5

Doi: 10.71100/STUDIA.2026.1.5

References:

  1. Abdullah, N. C. (2015). Going green in urbanisation area: Environmental alternative dispute resolution as an option. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.050
  2. Alkhayer, J., Gupta, N. & Gupta, C. M. (2022). Role of ADR methods in environmental conflicts in the light of sustainable development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1084, 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1084/1/012057
  3. Amaral Junior, A. do, Almeida, L. de & Vieira, L. K. (Eds.). (2020). Sustainable consumption: The right to a healthy environment. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16985-5
  4. Ansari, A. H., Ahmad, M. H. B. & Omoola, S. (2017). Alternative dispute resolution in environmental and natural resource disputes. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 59(1), 26–56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26826589
  5. Arora, N. K. & Mishra, I. (2023). Responsible consumption and production: A roadmap to sustainable development. Environmental Sustainability, 6, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-023-00266-9
  6. Assanova, M. A., Glazunova, S. B. & Kalkabayeva, G. M. (2025). European practice of sustainable development management towards green transformation: Monograph. Karaganda University of Kazpotrebsoyuz. https://keu.kz/attachments/article/11312/Monograph%20EPOS.pdf
  7. Awada, G. M. (2023). Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for international commerce disputes through UNCITRAL. Russian Law Journal, 11(5), 2993–3008.
  8. Baroncini, E. (2025). Promoting sustainability through dispute settlement: The first practice in the new EU trade agreements. Seminario Giuridico della Università di Bologna, 449–465. https://dx.doi.org/10.30682/sg343
  9. Benöhr, I. & Micklitz, H.-W. (2018). Consumer protection and human rights. In Howells, G., Ramsay, I. & Wilhelmsson, T. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on International Consumer Law (2nd ed., pp. 16–34). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785368219.00007
  10. Benöhr, I. (2020). The United Nations Guidelines for Consumer Protection: Legal implications and new frontiers. Journal of Consumer Policy, 43(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-019-09443-y
  11. Benöhr, I. (2023). The right to water and sustainable consumption in EU law. Journal of Consumer Policy, 46(1), 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-022-09532-5
  12. Biard, A. (2018). Monitoring consumer ADR in the EU: A critical perspective. European Review of Private Law, 26(2), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3160800
  13. Biard, A. (2019). Impact of Directive 2013/11/EU on consumer ADR quality: Evidence from France and the UK. Journal of Consumer Policy, 42(1), 109–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-018-9394-z
  14. Blind, K. & Heß, P. (2023). Stakeholder perceptions of the role of standards for addressing the sustainable development goals. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 37, 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.02.016
  15. Cappellaro, F., D’Agosta, G., De Sabbata, P., Barroco, F., Carani, C., Borghetti, A., … Nucci, C. A. (2022). Implementing energy transition and SDGs targets throughout energy community schemes. Journal of Urban Ecology, 8(1), juac023. https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juac023
  16. Cohen, M. J. (2001). The emergent environmental policy discourse on sustainable consumption. In Cohen, M. J. & Murphy, J. (Eds.), Exploring Sustainable Consumption: Environmental Policy and the Social Sciences (pp. 21–37). Elsevier.
  17. Cortés, P. (2010). Online dispute resolution for consumers in the European Union. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847756
  18. Cortés, P. (2022). Directive 2013/11/EU on alternative dispute resolution for consumers and Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 on online dispute resolution. In Lodder, A. R. & Murray, A. D. (Eds.) EU Regulation of E-Commerce (pp. 222–246). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  19. Creutzfeldt, N. (2016). Implementation of the Consumer ADR Directive. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 5(4), 169–175.
  20. Cseres, K. J. & Reyna, A. (2021). EU state aid law and consumer protection: An unsettled relationship in times of crisis. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 12(8), 617–629. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpab037
  21. Czarnecka, M. & Zych, G. (2024). Consumer protection in the European Union. In Czarnecka, M. & Szaniawska, K. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Consumer Protection and Behaviour in Energy Markets (pp. 9–24). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003375883-3
  22. Davies, J. & Szyszczak, E. (2010). ADR: Effective protection of consumer rights? European Law Review, 35(5), 695–706.
  23. De Almeida, L. & Esposito, F. (2023). Consumers and the green transition between saying and doing: Promising consumer empowerment while restricting consumers’ choices is dangerous. Yearbook of European Law, 42, 407–427. https://academic.oup.com/yel/article-abstract/doi/10.1093/yel/yead011/7480241?redirectedFrom=fulltext
  24. Dernbach, J. C. (2011). Creating the law of environmentally sustainable economic development. Pace Environmental Law Review, 28(3), 614–674. https://doi.org/10.58948/0738-6206.1673
  25. Durovic, M. (2020). International consumer law: What is it all about? Journal of Consumer Policy, 43(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-019-09438-9
  26. Egbunike-Umegbolu, C. (2024). Contemporary overview of appropriate dispute resolution (ADR). In Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Comparative Perspectives: Nigeria, the UK, and the US (pp. 1–28). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57476-4
  27. Erimia, C. L., Sîrbu, R. & Paris, S. (2015). The European citizens’ right to health protection as stated in Europe 2020 Strategy for sustainable development. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM, 5(2), 805–810.
  28. Farber, D. A. (2012). Sustainable consumption, energy policy, and individual well-being. Vanderbilt Law Review, 65(6), 1479–1526. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol65/iss6/4/
  29. Firoiu, D., Ionescu, G. H., Cismaș, C. M., Costin, M. P., Cismaș, L. M. & Ciobanu, Ș. C. F. (2025). Sustainable production and consumption in EU member states: Achieving the 2030 sustainable development goals (SDG 12). Sustainability, 17(4), 1537. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041537
  30. Fonseca, L. & Carvalho, F. (2019). The reporting of SDGs by quality, environmental, and occupational health and safety-certified organizations. Sustainability, 11(20), 5797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205797
  31. Gillies, L., Coll, E., Hunter, J., Simpson, R., Law, S., Scholten, M., Kaya, S., Goanta, C., Aade, L. & Riefa, C. (2022). Cross-border enforcement of consumer law: Looking to the future. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://hdl.handle.net/10993/53834
  32. Gupta, A. & Bajpai, A. (2023). Green dispute resolution: A sustainable way of resolving disputes. In Sustainable Boardrooms: Democratising Governance and Technology for Society and Economy (pp. 155–173). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4837-6_9
  33. Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] EWCA Civ 576; [2004] 1 W.L.R. 3002.
  34. Hamřík, M. (2020). Recent and new challenges of the European Commission in consumer protection. In Blažo, O., Mokrá, L. & Máčaj, A. (Eds.) Bratislavské právnické fórum 2020: Právne výzvy pre novú Európsku komisiu (p. 76). https://www.flaw.uniba.sk/fileadmin/ praf/Veda/Zborniky/2020-12-30_Bratislava_Legal_Forum2020.pdf
  35. Hanriot, M. (2015). Online dispute resolution (ODR) as a solution to cross-border consumer disputes: The enforcement of outcomes. McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2(1), 1–22. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811195
  36. Hodges, C. (2015). Mass collective redress: Consumer ADR and regulatory techniques. European Review of Private Law, 23(5), 829–874. https://doi.org/10.54648/ERPL2015050
  37. Howells, G. & Straetmans, G. (2017). The interpretive function of the CJEU and the interrelationship of EU and national levels of consumer protection. Perspectives on Federalism, 9(2), E180–E215. https://doi.org/10.1515/pof-2017-0014
  38. Howells, G. & Weatherill, S. (2017). Consumer protection law (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259512
  39. Howells, G., Twigg-Flesner, C. & Wilhelmsson, T. (2017). Rethinking EU consumer law. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315164830
  40. Jackson, T. (2004). Negotiating sustainable consumption: A review of the consumption debate and its policy implications. Energy & Environment, 15(6), 1027–1051. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958305043026573
  41. John, R., Jaeger-Erben, M. & Rückert-John, J. (2016). Elusive practices: Considerations on limits and possibilities of environmental policy for sustainable consumption. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1706
  42. Juškys, A. & Ulbaitė, N. (2012). Alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes in the European Union: Current issues and future opportunities. Issues of Business and Law, 4, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.5200/ibl.2012.03
  43. Kawiński, M. (2009). Consumer protection and dispute resolution within the EU financial sector. PROGRES, 49, 1–6.
  44. Kaya, S. & Sahin-Sengül, E. (2025). Consumer ADR in the EU. In Sahin-Sengül, E. & Kaya, S. (Eds.), Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution in Emerging Economies (pp. 6–24). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032689739-2
  45. Keirsbilck, B. (2024). Empowering consumers for the green transition: Overview of Directive (EU) 2024/825. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 13(5). https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+European+Consumer+and+Market+Law/13.5/EuCML2024028
  46. Ladan, M. T. (2018). Achieving sustainable development goals through effective domestic laws and policies on environment and climate change. Environmental Policy and Law, 48(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-180049
  47. Logan, C. (2017). Ambitious SDG goal confronts challenging realities: Access to justice is still elusive for many Africans (Afrobarometer Policy Paper No. 39). Afrobarometer. https://www.afrobarometer.org/publication/pp39-access-to-justice-in-africa/
  48. Loos, M. B. M. (2016). Enforcing consumer rights through ADR at the detriment of consumer law. European Review of Private Law, 24(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.54648/ERPL2016004
  49. Magalhães, F. D. A. M. & Calle, I. M. (2025). Consumer protection in the digital age: A reflection on Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. In Enes, G., Neves, I. & Rocha, T. M. (Eds.) A Digital Europe for Citizens: Data Governance, Data Markets, Data Services (pp. 171–188). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-02500-5_10
  50. Manuel, M. & Manuel, C. (2018). Achieving equal access to justice for all by 2030: Lessons from global funds (ODI Working Paper 537). Overseas Development Institute. https://odi.org/en/publications/achieving-equal-access-to-justice-for-all-by-2030-lessons-from-global-funds/
  51. Marques, C. L. (2014). Consumer protection in private international law rules: The need for an Inter-American Convention on the law applicable to some consumer contracts and consumer transactions (CIDIP). Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito – PPGDir./UFRGS, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.22456/2317-8558.51111
  52. Miller, J. R. (2006). Alternative dispute resolution (ADR): A public procurement best practice that has global application. In International Public Procurement Conference Proceedings (pp. 653–668). https://www.ippa.org/images/PROCEEDINGS/IPPC2/Article_24_Miller.pdf
  53. Mišćenić, E. (2019). The effectiveness of judicial enforcement of the EU consumer protection law. In Meškić, Z., Kunda, I., Popović, D., Omerović, E. (Eds.) Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2019 (pp. 129–153). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/16247_2019_8
  54. Mont, O. & Dalhammar, C. (2005). Sustainable consumption: At the cross-road of environmental and consumer policies. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(4), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2005.009575
  55. Moreira, T. (2019). UNCTAD – United Nations Conference for Trade and Development is the international forum to discuss global consumer protection issues. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 8(4). https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+ of+European+Consumer+and+Market+Law/8.4/EuCML2019025
  56. Nosyreva, E. (2001). Alternative dispute resolution in the United States and Russia: A comparative evaluation. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, 7(1).
  57. Ntuli, N. (2018). Africa: Alternative dispute resolution in a comparative perspective. Conflict Studies Quarterly, 22, 36–80. https://doi.org/10.24193/csq.22.3
  58. Pettoello-Mantovani, C. & Olivieri, B. (2022). Food safety and public health within the frame of the EU legislation. Global Pediatrics, 2, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpeds.2022.100020
  59. Reins, L. & Wijns, J. (2025). The “Safe and Sustainable by Design” concept: A regulatory approach for a more sustainable circular economy in the European Union? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 16(S1), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.29
  60. Rühl, G. (2011). Consumer protection in choice of law. Cornell International Law Journal, 44(3), 569–601. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol44/iss3/4/
  61. Sabato, S. & Grossi, T. (2025). Implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights through eco-social policies: Understanding available governance options (OSE Paper Series, Research Paper No. 67). European Social Observatory. https://www.ose.be/index.php/publication/ implementing-european-pillar-social-rights-through-eco-social-policies
  62. Salzman, J. (1997). Sustainable consumption and the law. Environmental Law, 27, 1243–1293. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/1078/
  63. Sander, F. E. A. (1985). Alternative methods of dispute resolution: An overview. Florida Law Review, 37(1), 1–18. https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol37/iss1/1/
  64. Scott, C. (2018). Enforcing consumer protection laws. In Howells, G., Ramsay, I. & Wilhelmsson, T. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on International Consumer Law (2nd ed., pp. 466–490). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785368219.00023
  65. Senatore, V. & di Prisco, E. (2022). Consumer protection in cross-border disputes. In Ayman, U. (Ed.) A New Era of Consumer Behavior: In and Beyond the Pandemic. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108539
  66. Spaargaren, G. (2009). Sustainable consumption: A theoretical and environmental policy perspective. In Mol, A. P. J., Sonnenfeld, D. A. & Spaargaren, G. (Eds.), The Ecological Modernisation Reader: Environmental Reform in Theory and Practice (pp. 318–334). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003061069-21
  67. Ström, P. (2020). The European services sector and the green transition (PE 648.768). European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/648768/IPOL_BRI (2020)648768_EN.pdf
  68. Unberath, H. & Johnston, A. (2007). The double-headed approach of the ECJ concerning consumer protection. Common Market Law Review, 44(5), 1237–1284. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2007113
  69. Wang, Y. (2017). Promoting sustainable consumption behaviors: The impacts of environmental attitudes and governance in a cross-national context. Environment and Behavior, 49(10), 1128–1155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516680264
  70. Weber, F. (2015). Is ADR the superior mechanism for consumer contractual disputes? An assessment of the incentivizing effects of the ADR Directive. Journal of Consumer Policy, 38(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-015-9291-7
  71. Yiatrou, V. (2023). The Good National Judge: How justice reforms under the conditionality of NextGenerationEU may affect consumer protection enforcement (REBUILD Centre Working Paper No. 9). SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4441453
  72. Zdraveva, N. (2025). ADR for consumer disputes in the consumer protection legislation of North Macedonia. In Bungenberg, M. & Kamilovska, T. Z. (Eds.), Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Western Balkans: Trends and Challenges (pp. 257–272). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76345-8_16
Back to the previous page

studia logo.webp

Topics

Current issue

studia-vol13-no1-2026_cover.jpg