Download article

Authors: Szatmári, Nikolett

Title: The Presence of Nonverbal Communication in (Procedural) Law

Abstract: This study examines the role of nonverbal communication in legal contexts, with particular attention to its significance in Hungarian law and international jurisprudence. It argues that gestures, facial expressions, posture, eye contact, and vocal cues can provide valuable insight into emotions, intentions, and credibility, even though they are not formally recognized as independent means of proof. The paper first outlines the theoretical relationship between communication and nonverbal communication, then explores the growing relevance of nonverbal signals in areas such as mediation, civil procedure, criminal procedure, labour law, and family law. It also reviews selected international cases in which nonverbal behaviour influenced investigations, public perception, or judicial evaluation. The study concludes that nonverbal communication can support legal decision-making, but its interpretation remains complex due to subjectivity, cultural variation, and the effects of digitalisation. Therefore, greater professional awareness and training are needed to ensure its careful and responsible use in the service of justice.

Keywords: Nonverbal communication, legal proceedings, witness credibility, mediation, judicial decision-making

Cite as: Szatmári, N. (2025). The Presence of Nonverbal Communication in (Procedural) Law. Studia Juridica et Politica Jaurinensia, 12(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.71100/STUDIA.2025.2.6

Doi: 10.71100/STUDIA.2025.2.6

References:

1. Act CXXX of 2016 on the Code of Civil Procedure (Pp.).
2. Act LV of 2002 on Mediation Activities (Közv. tv.).
3. Act V of 2013 on the Civil Code (Ptk.).
4. Act XC of 2017 on Criminal Procedure (Be.).
5. Allison, J. R. (1990). Five ways to keep disputes out of court. Harvard Business Review on Negotiation and Conflict Resolution. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10106402/
6. Ambady, N. & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256
7. Ambady, N. & Weisbuch, M. (2010). Nonverbal behavior. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T. & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 464–497). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001013
8. Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily communication. Methuen.
9. Birkenbihl, V. F. (2007). Testbeszéd. Trivium Kiadó.
10. Buda, B. & László, J. (1981). Beszéd a szavak mögött. Tömegkommunikációs Kutatóközpont.
11. Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. John Murray. https://historiesdrawingsprints.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/darwin-the-expression-of-emotion-1872.pdf
12. Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. Henry Holt and Company. https://zscalarts.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/emotions-revealed-by-paul-ekman1.pdf
13. Fisher, R., Ury, W. & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Houghton Mifflin. https://www.rhetoricinstitute.edu.gr/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/fisher-getting-to-yes.pdf
14. Hengl, M. (2023). Jogi kommunikáció: Jogi területen hasznosítható kommunikációs ismeretek. Pécsi Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar. https://pea.lib.pte.hu/server/api/core/bitstreams/50f9cf3f-c5e5-4b67-bc26-c4d4a4ddd0d5/ content
15. Horányi, Ö. (2003). Kommunikáció I. – A kommunikatív jelenség. General Press Kiadó.
16. Orlando, A. (n.d.). Advantages and disadvantages of dispute resolution processes. Blaney McMurtry LLP. https://www.blaney.com/sites/default/files/other/adr_advantages.pdf
17. Thompson, J. (2015). Nonverbal communication and the skills of effective mediators: Developing rapport, building trust, and displaying professionalism [Doctoral dissertation]. Griffith University Australia. https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/3625
18. Tremmel, F. (1993). Igazságügyi retorika. Janus Pannonius Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar.
19. Vanderkool, L. & Pearson, J. (1983). Mediating divorce disputes: Mediator behaviors, styles and roles. National Council of Family Relations. https://doi.org/10.2307/583696
20. Wilhem, J. (2015, June). A kommunikáció történetének rövid áttekintése. Fókusz. https://www.fokusz.info/index.php?cid=1161908925&aid=1268641658