Download article

Authors: Stipkovits, Tamás István

Title: The freedom of research and university autonomy from the viewpoint of technology transfer according to the law of Hungary and Austria (Styria) and Germany (Brandenburg)

Abstract: This study explores the evolving dynamics of university autonomy and the freedom of research considering increasing expectations for technology transfer within higher education institutions. Focusing on Hungary, Austria (Styria), and Germany (Brandenburg), the paper provides a comparative legal analysis of how these Central European jurisdictions reconcile traditional academic freedoms with the modern entrepreneurial role of universities. It addresses how constitutional provisions, higher education laws, and patent regulations shape institutional and individual rights in the context of academic capitalism. By analysing legal frameworks and key court decisions, the study tensions between institutional autonomy and researchers’ rights, particularly regarding intellectual property and administrative governance. The findings suggest that while Brandenburg provides a model of integration between legal clarity and institutional support for innovation, Hungary and Austria reveal gaps in the horizontal protection of academic freedoms and the legal recognition of researchers' roles in knowledge commercialization.

Keywords: University autonomy, freedom of research, technology transfer, intellectual property rights, higher education law

Cite as: Stipkovits, T. I. (2024). The freedom of research and university autonomy from the viewpoint of technology transfer according to the law of Hungary and Austria (Styria) and Germany (Brandenburg). Studia Juridica et Politica Jaurinensia, 11(2), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.71100/STUDIA.2024.2.3

Doi: 10.71100/STUDIA.2024.2.3

References:

1. Act CCIV of 2011 on National Higher Education (HNHEA)
2. Act XXXIII of 1995 on the patent protection of inventions (HPA)
3. Barakonyi K. (2004). Egyetemek irányítása: A középkori egyetemtől a Bologna-folyamatig. Magyar Tudomány, 110(4), 513-526.
4. Bleiklie, I. & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and Governance of Universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300167
5. Brandenburgisches Hochschulgesetz (BbgHG)
6. Bundesgerichtshof. Judgment of February 5, 2013. X ZR 59/12.
7. Bundesgesetz über die Organisation der Universitäten und ihre Studien (UG)
8. Bundesverfassungsgesetz über die Nachhaltigkeit, den Tierschutz, den umfassenden Umweltschutz, die Sicherstellung der Wasser- und Lebensmittelversorgung und die Forschung (BVG-Nachhaltigkeit).
9. Campbell, P. E. (2019). University Inventions Reconsidered: Debunking the Myth of University Ownership, William & Mary Business Law Review, 11(1), 117-125. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmblr/vol11/iss1/3
10. Constitutional Court of Austria. Decision of October 3, 1977. VfSlg 8136/1977.
11. Constitutional Court of Germany. Decision of May 29, 1973. BVerfG 1 BvR 424/71, 1 BvR 325/72.
12. Constitutional Court of Germany. Decision of September 25, 2023. BVerfG 1 BvR 2219/20.
13. Constitutional Court of Hungary. Decision of June 22, 2021. 21/2021. (VI. 22.) AB.
14. Constitutional Court of Hungary. Decision of June 24, 1994. 34/1994. (VI. 24.) AB.
15. Constitutional Court of Hungary. Decision of October 27, 2005. 41/2005. (X. 27.) AB.
16. Czychowski, C. (2019). Overview of Technology Transfer in Germany. les Nouvelles – Journal of the Licensing Executives Society, 54(2). 125-127. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3380545
17. Dienst- und Gehaltsordnung der Beamten der Landeshauptstadt Graz (DGO Graz)
18. Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 20(2), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1109/44.948843
19. Fundamental Law of Hungary (25 April 2011) (HFL).
20. G. Karácsony, G (2015). Állami szerepek a felsőoktatásban. Dialóg Campus Kiadó.
21. Gesetz über Arbeitnehmererfindungen (ArbEG)
22. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).
23. Jakab, A. (2002). Az osztrák EU-csatlakozás alkotmányjogi szempontból. Jogelméleti Szemle, 3(1), 1-42.
24. Kocsis, M. (2009, January 22.). A felsőoktatási autonómia fogalmáról és annak középkori gyökereiről. Jogi Fórum. https://www.jogiforum.hu/files/felsooktatasi_jog/20090122 kocsis_miklos-felsookt_autonomia%5Bjogi_forum%5D.pdf
25. Kohtamäki, V. & Balbachevsky, E. (2018). University autonomy: From past to present. In Pekkola, E., Kivistö, J., Kohtamäki, V., Cai, Y. & Lyytinen, A. (Eds.), Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives on Higher Education Management and Transformation (pp.180-193). University of Tampere Press.
26. Lisbon Declaration. (2007, April 13.). Europe’s Universities beyond 2010: Diversity with a common purpose. European University Association. https://www.eua.eu/publications/ positions/lisbon-declaration.html
27. Nybom, T. (2007). A Rule-governed Community of Scholars: The Humboldt Vision in the History of the European University. In Maassen, P. & Olsen, J. (Eds.), University Dynamics and European Integration. Higher Education Dynamics (pp. 55-80). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5971-1_3
28. Patentgesetz (PatG)
29. Petkó, M. (2004). A szolgálati és alkalmazotti találmány szabályainak értékelése a hatályos szabályozás alapján. Gazdaság és Jog, 12(3), 20-24.
30. Pöschl, M. (2022). Freedom of Research in Austria. In Gennaro, D. I., Hofmeister, H. & Lüfter, R. (Eds.), Academic Freedom in the European Context (pp. 151-186). Springer.
31. Pozsár-Szentmiklósy, Z. (2021). X. cikk: A tudományos kutatás és a művészeti alkotás szabadsága. A tanszabadság. In. Csink, L. (Ed.), Alapjogi Kommentár: Az Alkotmánybíróság gyakorlata alapján (pp. 106-117). Novissima Kiadó.
32. Pruvot, E. B., Estermann, T & Popkhadze, N. (2023, March 7.). University Autonomy in Europe IV: The Scorecard 2023. European University Association. https://www.eua.eu/ publications/reports/university-autonomy-in-europe-iv-the-scorecard-2023.html
33. Rösler, H. (2001). Bestand, Reform oder Abschaffung des § 42 ArbNErfG, [Doctoral dissertation]. Universität der Bundeswehr München. https://athene-forschung.unibw.de/85376
34. Rospigliosi, A. & Bourner, T. (2019). Researcher development in universities: Origins and historical context. London Review of Education, 17(2), 206-222. https://doi.org/10.18546/lre.17.2.08
35. Supreme Court of Hungary. Pf.IV.22.739/1997. EBH 2003.948.
36. Szalma, J. (2005). A szolgálati és alkalmazotti találmány a magyar jogban. Magyar Jog, 52(8), 495-500.
37. Usselman, S. W. (2013, November 11.). Research and Development in the United States since 1900: An Interpretive History. Yale University. https://economics.yale.edu/sites/default/files/ usselman_paper.pdf
38. Vígh, J. F. (2006). A felsőoktatás és az ipar közötti kutatási együttműködés elősegítésére kidolgozott szerződési modellek, különösen a „Berliner Vertrag”. Külgazdaság, 53(11-12), 137-155.
39. von Coelln, C. (2011). Die Freiheit der Wissenschaft, Forschung und Lehre. In Sachs, M. (Ed.), Grundgesetz Kommentar, 6 Auflage (pp. 343-352). Beck.
40. Vrielink, J., Lemmens, P., Parmentier, S. & the LERU Working Group on Human Rights. (2011). Academic Freedom as a Fundamental Right. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 13, 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.009